You can download the pictures to your computer any which way, Bridge will still be able to show all the downloaded pictures, heck, it can show pictures that are not only downloaded to your computer, but also pictures on a thumb drive without any need for import into a certain database. There are differences between Bridge and Lightroom, but I would not consider "4 applications" vs "1 application" as a difference between them.ġ. Adobe photo downloader is not necessary. It can be as seamless as editing a picture within Lightroom.
Anyway, when editing anything within Bridge, it does not have to open or launch a separate application. Actually Camera Raw engine is not different from Lightroom's editing engine. Camera Raw acts like a native engine within Bridge. You can download the pictures to your computer any which way, Bridge will still be able to show all the downloaded pictures, heck, it can show pictures that are not only downloaded to your computer, but also pictures on a thumb drive without any need for import into a certain database.Ģ. You get to choose.ġ. Adobe photo downloader is not necessary. It’s largely a personal opinion, because you’ll just as easily find people who love Bridge and can’t stand Lightroom Classic.
#Windows 2012 remote desktop manager pro
Bridge is also better if the files you work with extend far beyond the scope of just photographic images, because Bridge also works with vector graphics from Adobe Illustrator, video files and motion graphics from Adobe Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects, layout files from Adobe InDesign, web graphics, fonts…īut in a pure photographic workflow, Bridge slows me down too much. In contrast, the workflow with Bridge requires four separate applications to achieve the same workflow: Adobe Photo Downloader for direct import from camera/card to Bridge, Adobe Bridge for organization and metadata, Camera Raw for raw editing, and Adobe Photoshop for printing.īridge is better if you prefer to use a pure file browser rather than a catalog based on a database. In Lightroom Classic it’s all in one application from import to print. There are more options, more keyboard shortcuts for those options, better support for multiple displays, etc. Although most of the raw and metadata batch editing I want to do is possible with Camera Raw and Bridge, in Lightroom Classic the same tasks are faster and more efficient once you learn the tools.
0 kommentar(er)
